It’s been discussed thousands of times and again of course it would be good to see things improved on this, but:
-
authors are already upset by delays and trying to provide actionable feedback on every file would take up an unrealistic amount of time plus in a vast % of cases not actually resolve the problem.
-
We see in these forums many rejected files and envato themselves have even said that one challenge they have is that a huge % of submissions are nowhere close to the standard (not to mention in a number of worrying cases ripped from others).
-
If reviewers took the time to explain that typography or hierarchy etc. is not good enough – how many
of the authors of hard rejected files would actually have the skillset and ability to interpret, understand and execute proper resolution to fix it?
If they did (in their mind) fix things and then were rejected again because it was still not good enough in the reviewer’s mind, would this not cause further problems and upset?
Surely if they understood best practice in these areas then they would have implemented it in the first place?
I get that it is frustrating but as with everything here envato will never be able to please everyone and what they do seems to be the best option.