@marcoarib Hi, thanks for feedback. May I know the site you use to validate it, love to try?
Doesnât the reviewer concern seriously about the aesthetic and design of my theme (I feel like itâs not about html validation that makes this got rejected, I donât know)?
Iâm not sure what they mean by âimplementation is not sorryâ ? Is it about design or anything else?
Thatâs really creative one here, good job
canât say much about the homepage i didnât face any problem to understand it, but your posts pages need little workâŚ
I see you are using bootstrap grid what if you replaced the col-md-10
with col-md-8 (donât forget to replace col-md-pull-10 with
col-md-pull-8) ?
There is many negative white spaces inside your posts pages
Find a way to make me feel that I reached the end of the site, a footer maybe ?
I am no one to talk about rejection,
If they talk about implementation. They are refering to the coding technique you used in your code. In terms of features, well it is already on 110%.
Well accourding to implementation, they can also mean by , how a wordpress theme is installed on clients platform.
When they activate theme via admin panel, are they able to configure the theme and etc features, is it working properly on a wrodpress admin panel.
Mainly, my theme is bundled with Redux Framework theme options & metaboxes. The plugin installation will be automatically notified by TGM Plugin Activation. As well, demo data is already provided in the theme for users to import.
Iâm quite lost now what I can add more to the theme.
I would make all of the post âboxâ clickable not just the title, it took me a second or two to realise I couldnât click the image to take me to the post
the changes scrollbar annoys me, keep the default browser one as thatâs what users are used too
the text color on single posts seems a little too light, could make it a tad darker to improve readability
no footer is quite annoying as there is no âendâ to the site⌠you keep expecting something to show
Hi @Gareth_Gillman, thanks for your detailed comments
I agree with that and Iâll take that for improvement
About scrolling, do you think we should implement inertia scrolling in case users use Windows?
or just use the default one as you mentioned?
Do you have any suggestions specifically for the homepage?
Is the design/effects/transition too simple or should it add something to make it more standout?
I donât see anyone comments much about aesthetic or design.
Do you think the reviewer reject because of its design also?
I would agree to Gareth, I suggest you remove the custom scroll bar. keep the default.
As for the Homepage, as others have suggested, put an end to it, You can do so by adding a footer, or by removing the loop.
The font on single page is too light, try making it darker,
also, it might just be me, but, I think there is just too much white space below the post titles.
Other than that, It truly is a very unique theme and I simply love it. Cant wait to see this on the market. (Yes it is possible to resubmit the theme after modification,)
See the Thread and the suggestions. Think the template is awesome and would love to buy it when itâs finished for my law firm. Btw Iâm also starting author on AJ.
I did ThemeCheck already and the red warnings left are only from mostly Redux framework and TGM plugin which many authors are already used it in the theme nowadays.
Do you guys think adding Visual Composer will help ?
Is it required or become madatory now?
P.S. I have just had only 2 themes in my portfolio and I havenât frequently created new ones for TF. So, i may not catch up with much about the current market requirements.
doesnât need vc and personally wouldnât add it as your layouts arenât complicated enough⌠donât keep adding features, spend time looking at the website, look at the user journey and see how you can simplify the journey (from pag x to page y)⌠have a look at websites such as 5 second test which let people test your website in 5 seconds, you will get a decent idea if the ux of the website can be improved.