hi the first one is a combination of a mistake for a template , sorry to tell u just this , but I’d better tell u the reality so that u can identify what is the problem. The fact of the matter is that , in some cases, u can have a logo with a lot of details ,American franchises used to have and they were great but the trend has shifted to minimalist things globally (unfortunately) and detailed are looking rather bad when they are put in small size and here it looks that they consider the small size indeed. If u can possibly offer a logo like this to a customer, as a customized freelance job, for instance, this style is clearly not matching the needs a template marketplace , since , when u put two two together indeed, how many people would really have an identity in keeping with what seems to be your target? close to none, and this is just about target issues and commercial potential considerations … the design part has not even ben really considered yet in a way … I guess u can identify that a logo judged as having close to no commercial potential may not make it for sale… this is just for concept and “usability” so to speak . Then there’s the more traditional graphic part indeed. The real problem is the curved text not following the curve of the ground above … this looks not professionally executed enough like this and there is a negative impact of the global result visually speaking, I assume u can understand, right? After that the typo is really super flat and far from standards no matter what is the category here. Let’s face it, in GR, typo is a major issue, probably the major one, no matter what is the type of work u are creating. Right now, there is a blatant lack of relief, introducing variations, font combinations and possible touches of of originality would help to generate extra value , without the shadow of a doubt. Moreover, giving such an extensive name does not allow u to focus on the name so that there is what can be seen as a global lack of impact combined with problem of proportion between text and illustration, with the illustration part prevailing unreasonably over the text one, which, in terms of branding makes very little sense … Still more or less typo related , u cannot expect here to have the item approved when u are messing with the contrast graphic design principle. this one, as all the other one is an essential point, but particularly this one I might add, since this gets u into trouble in a snowball effect to have contrast-oriented issues …in all cases , like here there is a bad impact of exposure, readability and hierarchy of information. As nothing is outstanding, the text does not pop out so is rather hard to read and the hierarchy is not as good as could be expected owing to the problem of proportion between elements plus the colors failing to contrast enough …
for me the jump runner one is far far better … though there is a slight feeling of deja vu resulting from it. To tell u how I feel , I assume that this logo is a J letter one and this is one of my main 2 issues with what u have here … the J is hard to read to say the least … u should either have a gap between the body and right leg or at least a gradient with a darker color to be used as sort of a divider so that people can read the J much much more … pls see the attached file …
otherwise the main issue is once again a contrast one … to be honest , yes , this is harmonious, no doubt, I can;tblame u for this but to be honest your work is definitely not being underlined either … this is the bottom like. Let’s say that the main body of the logo could potentially be ok if we are not too rigorous, but for the tagline , this is simply not possible … the thing is unreadable , too thin, not contrasting enough too small if u do not do anything for the other issues , so that there is a real issue here