Is there an authority that takes the work of authors seriously and gives importance to their problems?
On December 14, 2023 the AI Chat GPT Lottie Elements [link removed] project was accepted.
We presented three versions of this project.
On December 19, 2023, the AI Chat GPT Elements For Premiere Pro [link removed] version was accepted.
Yesterday we received an email that the remaining After Effects and Final Cut Pro X versions were rejected.
“We have completed our review of “AI Chat GPT Elements For After Effects” and unfortunately found that it is not of the quality standard required to move forward and you will not be able to resubmit this item.”
“We have completed our review of “AI Chat GPT Elements for Final Cut Pro X” and unfortunately found that it is not up to the quality standard required to move forward and you will not be able to resubmit this item.”
Why were these versions of exactly the same quality rejected?
If it is hard rejected there is not much you can do…
You can try to make significant changes to the project and try again, other than this I don’t think you can do anything else… this is how Enato works…
1 Like
Same problem here, my footage was rejected and the reason was given as “Quality issue” Same Camera footage was accepted earlier.
Will be grateful if someone will help out. The review also said to visit our forums, the authors there will help you.
1 Like
Resubmitting the project with different methods is one option, but why am I wasting time on something that I am sure of and that is technically not a problem? It is thought-provoking for this platform that we, the authors, are still spending extra time on problems that should have been solved by now.
1 Like
What is the quality problem? Since we cannot see which subjects qualify and which subjects do not, this reason seems to me very absurd and distracting. I think my project will contribute to Envato and Envato users both as a subject and technically. And I project topics that are likely to get downloads to earn even more. I think some attention should be paid.
1 Like
Usually, when it is a hard reject the entire project has an issue this is why they “don’t waste time” explaining the issues.
Maybe some experienced author can open your eyes with fixing this.
1 Like
agreed, rejection is ok, but reason should be mentioned so that author can improve the work or solve the problem.
Tha’s what is forum all about, we have to wait for someone to come forward and explain…