PSD Template hard rejection

Hello,

Мy PSD template was hard rejected.I created 14 Pages bellow some link :

    - http://egprojets.com/psd/fourin/01_Homepage.png
    - http://egprojets.com/psd/fourin/02_Menu.png
    - http://egprojets.com/psd/fourin/03_Agency_about_us.png
    - http://egprojets.com/psd/fourin/04_Agency_what_we_do.png
    - http://egprojets.com/psd/fourin/08_Cases.png
    - http://egprojets.com/psd/fourin/09_Cases_detail.png

Bellow the message that’s I receive :

“”=== Our Review team also provided these comments:

Your item does not provide the necessary design quality for this
category. As higher quality items become available in the marketplace,
approval requirements will increase to maintain appropriate marketplace
quality.While I’d be able to provide feedback as to how to get this
approved, I can only do after it has crossed a certain threshold,
quality wise. I’m sorry to say this isn’t there yet. ===""

Please suggest me something to improve it.

Any reply ?

It is ok but not up to par for PSD category here (this is super hard to be accepted into and needs to be pixel perfect flawless in design).

  • There are fundamental issues with typography and alignment e.g. font inconsistency, certain elements e.g. logo/menu do not align to any other part of the page (copyright link aside)

  • There needs to be more features/elements

  • The design needs more refinement

It’s not a bad concept and may have more chance if coded but needs to fix a few little bits

Thank you very much for your reply.

Wich category you suggest me ( HTMl or Wordpress or LayerWP ) ?

Either but HTML is probably better.

You will still need to refine the type, alignment, sort out some of the excess negative space and add more to it

Good design, but not enough to TF. It would probably be better if a grid system and significant improvements in the typography is added.

Go ahead you will do it soon

Thanks for all reply, it’s help me a lots

Hello @charlie4282 , @Th3s

I put some change on the homepage based on your comments.
Can you tell me if this sufficient and I’m in the right line :

        http://egprojets.com/psd/fourin/01_Homepage_last.png

Thanks for all.

  • Alignment is better

  • Still not sure about this central grid layout for a few reasons:

  1. The empty space on second and third row is really not good
    2 the typography is ok and I get what you are trying to do but not sure it really works.
  2. Once coded this is going to need some cautious consideration how it will work on mobile esp. if people use different word lengths etc
  • The alignment of the footer widgets - how would that work? It looks like they have varied alignment to be in that position

It is an improvement on where you were but still way off approval I fear.

  • The typography could be improved
  • The whole design relies a lot on the other pages to make some of the more obscure ideas work
  • It feels a little empty and basic still
  • That central grid areas really needs fixing especially the positioning and negative space

Hello @charlie4282,

Really many thanks for your precious comment, it’s help me a lot to be in the right line.

Thank you very much,

Definitely the changes made are very small and are not enough to be accepted.

You have to do something new but functional. For example “at the top you have to take into account the focal point and proximity is far the title and description of the button that leads to action.”

Keep working and I agree with Charlie

Best regards

Hello @Th3s

Really many thanks for your helps

Thank you very much,

Hello @charlie4282 @Th3s

Many thanks for all your previous help,
We has recently posted a new template PSD, and we got now a soft rejection, bellow the PS :

         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/1.jpg
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/2.jpg           
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/2_1.jpg
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/3.jpg
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/4.jpg
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/5.jpg
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/6.jpg
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/7.jpg
         - http://37.139.10.161/psd_loover/8.jpg 

Bellow the message from Reviews Team :

======
Resubmission Soft Rejection

Thank you for your submission.

  1. READABILITY: Parts of your design are either difficult to read or
    have contrast issues. Please make sure all sections of your design have
    adequate contrast and all text is easily.

  2. SPACING AND ALIGNMENT: There are spacing and alignment issues in this
    item. Please make sure that all elements are aligned properly and
    spacing is consistent from section to section.
    Here are some articles
    with more information regarding negative space and proper spacing:
    http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/articles/using-white-space-or-negative-space-in-your-designs--webdesign-3401,

http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/articles/adding-space-to-your-designs--webdesign-14836

Can you please give me your suggestions about the readability and problem with spacing in my templates, and on wich section or page ?
Thank you very much for your helps!!.