I will go to the guide you wrote after a shower, but wanted to state one thing here.
Pertaining to what you mentioned, “MILLIONS of Youtubers solve claims, it’s very easy.”
Let me ask you something, if the entire world (or MILLIONS) vs 30k, which group should prevail?
Just because SOME industries are protected (alcohol, tobacco, oil, music, movies, etc.) doesn’t make it right to manipulate the masses to do anything.
Here’s a scenario, let’s say I watch and record a murder. The murderer vocalized a jingle as he was puncturing your child, but the video was inadmissable to youtube because I didn’t get the murderer’s permission for the jingle.
Okay that was a stupid example…I just woke up. I’ll re-read your post a little later and edit or remove this early morning comment .
WAIT A MINUTE! I just thought of a PERFECT real-life example of why this copyright manipulation ought to be illegal, it’s something that is documented!
https://images.clerkofcourts.municipal.co.clark.oh.us/CISWeb/Search.aspx?caseNumber=15CVF02981
*If you go to the aforementioned link, look for the youtube links within the motions. Thanks to copyright, the links go nowhere when it was time to go to court (simply because a song happen to have been playing in the background…phhhhtt…).
So, to summarize:
I recorded damages AS THEY WERE OCCURRING in a commercial building I rented.
The owner of that building later took the previous lease holder (and not me) to court.
I uploaded the videos that prove that the owner of the property is knowingly taking the wrong party to court.
Youtube kept pulling the videos and eventually suspended me!!
Why was the evidence being denied by youtube ? Because one of the computers in the background of one of the rooms was playing music!!!
But here’s the real deal, I was making videos of the damages for my own sanity and never once thought this issue would go to court in some future date so I didn’t know to park myself in a soundproof room while making the videos.
So a 73 year old woman that had nothing to do with nothing was found guilty (no kidding…she wasn’t even the tenant).
What would have brought justice is maybe for the plutocrats to be able to click the link and watch the video I made…instead the links went nowhere thanks to the youtube monopoly, haawk vultures, copyright protections, etc).
You can read more about that form of justus here: https://springfieldohiopost.com/legal/
Now keep in mind that I did not fathom or understand why youtube had pulled my videos.
I thought it was the property owner’s son-in-law, the cop (because “our” new laws enable the judicial system and their minions to pull anything that they deem as offensively… (pick your word).
So I was hating on a cop illegitimately when I should have been hating the created system that caused my evidence to be obfuscated.
It’s complicated and involves a girl that was drugged and raped.
More about the rape/drugging is here:
https://springfieldohiopost.com/nicole/
To date, that girl has not had justice, the cop still has his job, and an old woman was tricked out of her money and more BECAUSE OF COPYRIGHT!
copyright? right
If the industry want to copyright something then seal it up in a bottle and leave the rest of us to our peace.