So if I am 10 % faster than some themes I can’t pin-point that? Let me throw in a scenario.
There are themes that say they are Blazing Fast that they score 90%, 92% on page speed. And when you look at the demos and test the demos they score: 60%, 80%. Isn’t that lying ? Is that fair ?
Users don’t search until you tell them too. They don’t know how until you show them how. So If I will say I am the best of something I need to prove that? Otherwise the users will think that I am lying.
“If you say that you are fast, show me!!” " Oh, I see you are fast"
If phones are compared using benchmarks! Why shouldn’t themes be compared using benchmarks! In the end GTMetrix and Pingdom are reliable soruces, aren’t they?
So if I say I am doing something I want users to see that I am backing it up!
This is a competition not a shake-hand
How did Iphone compared the phone with the others? He showed images of those phones, they called names.
How Bugatti told he is the fastest? He told and then people compared by testing with other super-cars and showed the results!
I have to wait for people to do such comparisons? I don’t think so. I am not breaking any rule. If you say you are fast prove it.
If I am faster than you and can prove it I will call you to the challange.
How can we challenge the top 10-20 without calling them up to a challenge by using reliable test sources?
Is it my fault that big items fall on some areas? No. Their job is to be the best in every scenario. My job is to challenge their best.
If I beat one of their best I think I am allowed to point that. Otherwise I don’t see how there will be a “New Kid on the block”
In the end the users will decide. Remember, this is not a hand-shake. This is a competition. If I am better at something and I can prove it then I think there is no law that can forbid me to show it. Even though I called names.
I will update the comparisons daily. So the ones that will be compared need to improve!
This is a race for being the best. I have the right to try!
Mediacreed - Mario