How do they remove Audio Jungle Watermark????

:notes: but only one :slight_smile: look for it under your video on YouTube

Voldemort will forgive us:)) Never uploaded with AdRev agreement, just don’t know details. Thanks!

I think taht too

I learned about it only from this thread and then checked on youtube by myself.

Congratulations. If this service is never used then there is nothing to check, right?

I can’t understand what did you mean :frowning: But I found some of my tracks that I submitted on AdRev and I was very confused. Everyone can use it for his video but only with ad… but I did not know about it for this time. :frowning:

I agree, for me it’s a big surprise too :disappointed_relieved:

1 Like

Yeee ! Very big. If you will read that I wrote erlier in this thread you will understand my astonishment :worried:

Yes, of course I read previous posts and did not knew that need to upload for AdRev ā€œcleanā€ track separately. :worried:

I don’t know how AdRev ā€œmusic scan machineā€ and search system works… perhaps sending tracks with watermark even better… it will defend your copyrights better because YouTube will not have your clean track.

Guys, it’s worth reading up AdRev’s FAQ here if you’re not sure how it all works.

Also, just for your information, the submission of watermarked material into the system is not allowed, as they require the material to be accurately fingerprinted, ready for detection on YouTube.

2 Likes

Thanks, @Alumo ! You are our guide in the world of AdRev ! :pray: :blush:

1 Like

Haha thank you. But I’m honestly no guide. The information is all out there for any of us to discover and use to our advantage in this business. ā€˜Seek and ye shall find’ as the old saying goes :wink:

2 Likes

Or maybe you took the audio from YouTube and sell it here :slight_smile: just kidding

1 Like

Maybe the person took the time to record each individual track and mix it and master it just right so that it songs identical…You never know…

1 Like

I very much doubt that. It’s definitely music switched out on YouTube’s AudioSwap system, as explained previously in this thread.

1 Like

I know. I was just messing :slight_smile:

1 Like

Haha I got ya. Flew straight over my head! :blush:

@NoiseInNeumarkt

Just responding to you here instead of the AudioJungle Sales Monitor thread, as it would be pretty off-topic there :wink:

Haha not quite guru, just a musician that likes to obsessively ā€˜read manuals’ and maybe got a little bit over-excited and passionate about the prospect that composers can keep now check on their belongings, as it were.

Yes and no would be my answer to that.

In my experience so far, there are buyers on both sides of the camp. Those that completely understand the notion that they are essentially ā€˜renting’ someone else’s property to use within their own creative productions on YouTube and are perfectly happy to apply their purchased License Certificate to clear YouTube copyright notices.

And then there are those that firmly believe they have the God given right and entitlement to use other people’s property without scrutiny and that the very License Certificate they had just purchased is some random gobbledygook text that is no more worthy than scrunched up till receipt in the bottom of an old coat pocket.

Fortunately, there are far more in the first camp than the latter, and this number is growing as it’s now becoming a normal requirement on YouTube to show evidence of ā€˜commercial use rights’ when using third-party material within monetized productions.

Either way, having your music registered with AdRev (or any digital fingerprinting platform) will inevitably bring you in touch with your buyers in order to assist them should they need to have a claim cleared or request that their YouTube channel is whitelisted. I like to consider this as item ā€˜support’, because if you have your AJ music registered, you’ll need to outline that on your AJ items pages (more info on that here).

That said, if you wish to avoid any contact with buyers and just sell licenses, no questions asked, then I wouldn’t recommend submitting music to AdRev or any form of digital fingerprinting. Of course you music is then prone to being reused on YouTube without any form of compensation.

Hope that throws some light on things anyway.

4 Likes

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on AdRev @Alumo.

I know it’s something I’m going to implement, but have been worrisome over the potential impact on buyers and creating inconvenience for them.

It’s an inevitable switch though, and I’m glad to hear your thoughts on how you find most people are in in the ā€œcompletely understandingā€ camp.