I´m following since time ago the last marketplace movements and this one is definitively the worst.
Theme revisions. It´s totally normal they need so long timings to review, because Envato receives thousand of items every month and they need to review every item. The problem here, they don´t care quality, they don´t care if new authors have some previous experience -Creative Market asks for some previous works at least- and the worst part. You (Envato) don´t care if this new ‘item’ is a copycat about a decent existent one.
In my case, I have seen my items copied since I started here. I put a lot of attention and efforts designing new concepts and trying to create original products to add some value to the marketplace (better or worst it´s what I try). What I receive in change? Envato allows to anybody to copy and use assets from my projects with any control. This of course, demotivates me a lot to still follow doing my best here.
And now you are telling us that you will still allow people using assets with Leonardo Dicaprio pictures, assets from Zara and Asos, places where I was in conversations with the commercial areas to ask for permission to use and they are totally closed to allow such uses, by the way. And now, you are allowing to this really poor quality/copycaters authors to sell 50%/75%/90% lower than authors like @tommusrhodus , @FinalDestiny , @Bedros , me and many others that we contribute actively to the marketplace with quality items and quality services. Come on! If this decision progresses, it´s time in my case to think about moving from Themeforest and this looks like the final reason to do this. Because this is not gonna work, for sure.
If we have not bottom and top prices, this business model for authors is a complete RUIN.
I don´t use to comment any decision ‘by your side’ in forums, but this, guys, this is the last drop in our glasses. We can´t compete with $5 items, and in my opinion & with all my respects, this is a complete senseless.
Please, rethink about bottom/top pricing at least. Otherwise, this will be untenable.