Just uploaded a new item that has been rejected and I dont quite think it deserves that treatment.
In my humble opinion this would’ve been the best looking earth logo reveal on the market, unfortunately the reviewer thinks differently(not always I get to be reviewed by someone working in the field of after effects)
Wanted to get some thoughts from you guys about the rejection:
The reason for this rejection is:
""Because of it’s free price point, and how easy it has become to create these kinds of animations, files that appear have been created with VideoCopilot Orb plugin will be reviewed in an extra stringent manner – especially locked-camera animations of planets that simply sit and spin in place.
Unfortunately, this item does not offer anything new or unique, and cannot be accepted."
I don’t think that all animations should be Andrew Kramer’s style, and that everything should be fast or “dynamic” when it comes to space animations(and i did quite a bit space animations, the last one was working for 5 space startups for Singapore for their opening of a Singapore space organization), what I did particularly liked about this project is that you can feel the mass of the earth and get goose bumps after watching it over and over again.
Let me know what you think. Did this work deserve a simple generic hard rejection ?
Can you find a similar logo using city lights ?
Can a reviewer from envato explain to me what the standard is ?
Why should the camera be fast ?