I just submitted a few tracks. Three to be more precise.
one of them, an instrumental that I would consider a demo quality one, was accepted, whereas the one that I thought it was more professional was rejected. This is the message the “reviewers” sent me.
Thanks for your patience whilst your item was held for evaluation by the team.
After some consideration, it was determined that this item does not meet the general commercial quality standard required to be accepted on AudioJungle, unfortunately.
Is it common for this platform to have such an ambiguous and generic stock answer?
If these people take the time to listen to the material, like they say they do… Wouldn’t it be more productive that THEY give me the feedback as to why the job was rejected, rather than asking me to ask for feedback to people who HASN’T heard it??
IN any case, I’d like to learn with the experience, so how can I find out what is the issue with the track, so it doesn’t happen again?