Do you think its a good idea to name items with 100 characters? I think this is awful idea… now all the items in search results gonna be hard to read as they not going to be titles anymore but essays…
As its not the fault of author and not talking about item quality I will post the actual links to items.
Is that a title name? I think its becoming more like a summary with actual sentences in it… and its perfectly according to rules now.
I wonder that earlier rule of Titling is changed?, looks now automated, reviewer do not have any control over titles, I seen some files got soft rejected earlier for having “Loop, Full HD, Pan, Zoom” in their titles @cyzer those are not titles, it is a story boards lol
Hey guys, the rule hasn’t changed. It looks like these slipped through the cracks somehow and was not caught by the review team. I’ve corrected the items and will follow-up to ensure this gets sorted.
Sorry, but there was a discussion (one month ago) about the inconsistency between characters limit on the Upload page & the Item Edit update. The inconsistency was fixed by increasing the limit on the Upload page to 100 characters. I’m not sure if you’re aware of that.
The discussion: I thought there is Item Title Limit???
Well that’s sad news. Now we will have titles with stuffed words from many begginers and eager-to-sell authors. The item names should have very specific rules and guidelines. Like no periods, commas and symbols allowed. Except maybe “-” and “()”
Seeing such item names in search doesn’t help. What would you prefer? Item name which requires less reading and is compact and focused or some description sentence.
100 characters is not a item name anymore its description.
I noticed that too… and I think it’s awful…
Would be much better to increase the limit of 15 tags to 20 - instead of allowing long and ugly titles - that have a huge impact on the search engine,
also damaging our eyes
@cyzer@MarkBrodhuber We always try to name our projects in a creative style. We love to do that. But lately we noticed that it’s a bad idea in VideoHive. Why? because title is so more important than other search contents as tags and description. Unbelievable but our popular items are not in search pages. We made huge package explainer kit and named it “Pixity Land”, it sold 3112 till now. But You can’t find it in “explainer” keyword search (Actually it placed in page number 8 at the time)
Another example is our App Promo Mockup ( iTouch 2.0 ). Let’s try search app promo keyword and you can find this item in end of page 3.
Before applying this new algorithm for search, our HUD item (Quantum) was the first one when you were searching HUD keyword. Now it’s 54st.
I know and understand that our items should have the same chance like the other authors, BUT I mean why title is so important in new search algorithm and it’s a big bug. When you search “xxxxxxxxxxx” keyword , it brings all the items that named “xxxxxxxxxxx” first and then it looks for other items , however “xxxxxxxxxxx yy” have more chance than “xxxxxxxxxxx yy zz”.
We have a lot of topics these days about big bug of new search algorithm that really affects on our sales: