quality standard required to move forward

Hello
Thank you for your submission. We have completed our review of “Multiple-Blog Management System & Multi Tenancy Laravel” and unfortunately we found it isn’t at the quality standard required to move forward, and you won’t be able to re-submit this item again.

I do not understand what level of quality is this, do not explain where to place the change only reject, can someone help me know the reason for the rejection?

If you share the demo URL, we can check the project and post some comments.

Can you tell me the differences if you compare it with WordPress?
Why would someone need to purchase this one instead of using a CMS such as WordPress? What are the unique features the system is offering so I ( a buyer ) would consider to use it?

Apart from that front-end version didn’t look appealing.

  • The item manufactured by us is a multi-tenancy base

  • In multi-tenancy, you can create different databases and domains for different user bases which we have managed well from the coding side and all php standards have been followed and created website.

  • We will use multiple themes and provide different workspaces

  • Like Marketplace and Variant-News which will be selected role from the super admin side and within that the role will be selected Marketplace, Variant-News or blog then do that and we will create different workspace and for video we will add this thing soon. We guarantee that you can create different types of admins with different databases and domains within one project.

Still there’s no additional feature. You can manage everything with WordPress.
Find better idea/start a new project.

What could be the problem with code quality laravel

I was unable to check the code ( quality ) but to get the item approval, apart from the coding, you may need better design and good idea.

Okk thank you