Hello Envato authors.
I need help with my article, this since I do not understand the suggestions of a reviewer. I have let him know, but I have felt ignored. I feel like this person is not “doing” their job right by reviewing articles and making suggestions.
I hope I am wrong about that. A few days ago I sent an article to update it and received a suggestion / comment to improve my script. At one point I thought it was part of my problem, and it could be, but after taking the necessary time I realized that his suggestions didn’t make sense.
Immediately I put what he sent me.
Don’t suppress errors: https://envato.d.pr/l0Tp79
Keep libraries up-to-date, and don’t load from CDN: https://envato.d.pr/EMoI2X
Sanitize all input data: https://envato.d.pr/tRpfBW
For example, you can do this with jQuery as follows:
// Author code here
Use .on() rather than .click(), .bind(), .hover(), .submit() etc… https://envato.d.pr/6Q9kKv
md5() is cryptographically broken and should not be used.
Data Validation issues have been found. Do a global search for “echo $”.
All dynamic data must be correctly escaped for the context where it is rendered.
To this I responded with the following message that was clearly ignored, the person sent me the same message again. I think he didn’t even take the time to read my answer.
Hello Envato team, I appreciate you taking the time to review my article. I am in favor of suggestion number 3 that the reviewer / you have given me. You are right with this because of the loading times, I hope you take the following suggestion into account; you took screenshots to show me the code errors. But you forgot to take full screen shot of the code editor being used, this for me to know the file name and path.
This is done to avoid searching a word among hundreds of lines of code and files.
Next tip related to number one; in certain cases the developer can suppress errors for an optimal operation of the functions that are going to be used or are being used.
Next suggestion related to number two; you did not take the entire capture, just the line, and thus it is impossible to find the line of code that you are asking me to remove.
Suggestion number three related to number four, which in turn is related to number two; remove codes without knowing the origin.
Suggestion number four related to number five of the reviewer; I can’t find sense in the paragraph he wrote.
Tip number five related to your number six; you cannot demand a function that does not correspond to the action that I want to do.
Suggestion number six from reviewer’s observation number seven; I am using a dictation function, yes I accept. But it works with random and time codes, only for the security token, unless you have a quantum computer it would be almost impossible to break the token.
Suggestion number seven from observation number eight made by the reviewer; I did the revisions and found no errors in the error file, on what basis does it say this?
Those were my points, I hope they will be taken into account to avoid problems with me or with other authors. I will reload the same files from the previous time, this because their platform is paused when uploading the files, or it is carrying an infinite time
This morning I received an ultimatum; If I did not follow their “suggestions”, they would deactivate my account.
This is my complaint.