My position.

[anon65645678]

@SpaceStockFootage

Well why did you say you were equally rude then?! Sure, equally rude can theoretically mean 0% rude, but if somebody hasn’t been rude at all, then you’d just leave out the word rude entirely!

I gave an equivalent answer

@SpaceStockFootage

When did I say that?

If you think the “zigro” comment in the answer to my question is appropriate. So I’m right about the"bias."

@SpaceStockFootage

No I didn’t.

You said you"don’t see anything wrong."

@SpaceStockFootage

You’re wondering why your tracks were rejected… it’s only logical that people are going to focus more on reasons why they might have been rejected, and less on reasons why they should have been approved.

Let the authors become familiar with this topic before evaluating the work of other authors.

A Transparent Treatise of Inconsistency in AJ Review and Author Processes

The subject of Review Consistency regularly comes up on the boards again, so we felt the time was right for the matter to be addressed, for what it’s worth. Based on the astute observations of some of our long time members (ahem… privet, Kurly), we can either deny the existence of inconsistency outright, stonewalling, or treat it as a reality that needs to be managed in an ongoing way. But we’ll say it again, we care about what you think, so let’s begin by admitting the truth. At the end of t…