Hlo , I have got rejected my project with this message “we found it isn’t at the quality standard required to move forward, and you won’t be able to re-submit this item again.”
how i can identify which quality standard i have to maintain. i did very hard work on my project even i have created detailed documentation for my project.
i have developed it on latest laravel 11,php 8.2,mysql 8. The category of my project is MLM (multi level marketing) Binary + level structure software.
this is my demo url
Admin Detail
id : admin
pass : admin
User Detail
id : root
pass : root
i can share you code also if there has issue with code.I can also pay for review my project.but please help me to identify all the issue so that i can fix it asap and resubmit the project again. @sgeray@TheDevStation@KingDog@mgscoder@ki-themes
What I will say is that you do not deserve a hard reject. Whether it is the documentation or the details of the project, it definitely did not deserve this. I am impressed by your attention to details, especially the documentation. I saw a few layout issues at first glance, but as I said before, Envato does not care.
If they do not understand, hard reject.
If there are similar projects, hard reject.
If they are not happy that day, hard reject.
We brought Envato to this state, but now they are throwing us all out.
Unfortunately, you know they will never tell you what the problem is with your submission, they say go find the problem yourself. Why would I send my work to you if I thought there was a problem?
We have to learn to take care of ourselves somehow, Envato is getting out of control.
Again, I personally didn’t find any serious issues, but I did find a few misaligned data columns.
hlo @sgeray thanks for your time & comment.
i am agree with the issue. But not sure if i fix that issue then it will be accepted.The main problem what i have to do so that again it would not reject.
As per previous similar forum there has no fix parameter of review as you said we have to evaluate ourself.
I have check similar category project submitted by this author.i have made advanced features as compare to this project.even this author has all project same admin panel.he is getting approval of there project.
Admin panel https://script.viserlab.com/mlmlab/admin
what i observe that there has frontend design with the project. which i have not integrated. may be this can be reason of rejection bcz its hard to understand.
second i give title of project “MLMPro - Binary + Unilevel Advanced Platform” which is also confused to observer . what type of project it is. i want to make it specific title like “MLMPro - Investment Advanced Platform” & make the functionality to investment system.so that it would be easy to understand.
These are just my view point but not sure after all the updates it would approve or not.
