I received a hard rejection on my script and need advice on why that happened.

Envato Customers Web and Code
1

Hello fellows,

I received a hard rejection on this new item due to quality standards: https://timelyco.codelinkinfotech.com/

I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide me with some valuable advice regarding this matter.

Thanks a million.

2

Two issues:

  1. I don’t think this is necessarily suitable for a stock marketplace as typically professional organisations would invest in purpose built software

  2. It feels very unfinished - the links in the nav just scroll to sections on the same page, the admin is very basic without much more info than a list of companies. If you are going to play in this category then you need to be offering substantial features and functionality to compete e.g. reporting or dashboard on use, notifications, calendar views etc.

3

Thank you for feedback, I will work on it.

4

One more concern:

It is true that due to the unfinished aspects, this may not be suitable for a stock marketplace, as professional organizations typically invest in purpose-built software. In such a case, why did I receive a hard rejection? Couldn’t the team inform us to improve it and retry the submission?

5

They only give feedback on items close to the necessary standard where there is evidence of author understanding and where the gap to approval is managable.

Feedback on every submission would never be possible or sensible

6

I am facing the same issue of rejection again, even though I have added many features and made changes compared to the previous version. Can you guide me on what might be wrong? The home page is just for landing; the actual features are for company, employee, and admin accounts.

Is there any issue with URL? https://timelyco.codelinkinfotech.com/

8

I know there are other similar scripts available on envato but I still do not think that a serious business would rely on or manage confidential information via an unknown third party who can withdraw support or updates at any moment.

Putting that aside there’s not anything obvious that’ wrong but I imagine it would still be rejected due to:

  • The demo page needs more to it to bring things to life
  • The Admin is quite basic with limited functionality and missing features