this is my demo link - Index Page
i have received mail -
"Your item, Minfo Business - Responsive Bootstrap Template, has been rejected - Thank you for your submission. We have completed our review of “Minfo Business - Responsive Bootstrap Template” and unfortunately we found it isn’t at the quality standard required to move forward, and you won’t be able to re-submit this item again. "
my template is responsive, bootstrap made, easy to customize and works on most of browser, still rejected why .
i have title, html description, all photos and thumbnail
Preview -









Thumbnail

i have also given below template documentation which is well formatted, in detail.
Minfo Business Template-PDF.pdf (179.8 KB)
please help someone , why is rejected
With respect this is a long way off
There’s issues with design and execution basics esp the typography and layouts and it feels like off the shelf styling.
There’s nothing that could not easily be found for free online and lacks modern or premium features or functionality.
Check the attention to detail and versatility of popular items already for sale and you will see the gaps
what changes can i made, is still something pending in template
This will never be approved like this / you have to look at creating something more unique with more unique and premium features
It doesn’t need to be this advanced but this is the type of thing you are up against Canvas | The Multi-Purpose HTML5 Template by SemiColonWeb | ThemeForest
FYI budget hosting is a terrible thing to use too - it ruins performance for both reviewers and potential buyers
-
Not the only reason but not helping as it’s not competitive and remember multiple demos should have relevant purpose and functionality not just change some images and copy or colours
-
Generic hard rejection meaning there’s too much to offer details feedback
-
No but it makes a big difference to reviewers and potential buyers experience
4/5. Focus on the item itself first
-
Logo for the site? As long as logos are original and not trademarks or famous brands then it’s fine
-
I haven’t explored it in detail but that’s really the authors responsibility to ensure best practice and at the moment a lot of the design and functions feel very out of the box which should be developed further
-
That’s expected unless errors are unavoidable
It doesn’t need to be as evolved as Canvas but there needs to be enough to warrant someone wanting to buy yours over items like that and all they offer