My position (dont aim to offend authors, just trying to make it clear that rules and requirements for uploads are not the same and it seems to depend on inspectors taste or something personal stuff but not a very strong base of regulations):
I`ve pack all that pretty good renders in 3gb limit (abstract theme, gears for tech, hearts, social icons), made a global controls (universalize expressions), made a video tutorial. And that is not enought.
I can accept that there might be some minor improves or maybe i should remove icons, but i cann`t agree with hard reject. I think i provided enough proves that my template is not worse than accepted ones.
Looking forward for your help, becouse i dont understand the policy of videohive and what to do with all this content ive rendered.
My position (dont aim to offend authors), just trying to make it clear that rules and requirements for uploads are not the same and it seems to depend on inspectors taste or something personal stuff but not a very strong base of regulations.
you do good work Arleksey… & you make a good point regarding the other accepted projects… I was going to say they were posted years ago and standards have changed… but see they were recently accepted… Add this up to individual reviewer taste. Your particles are excellent… the only thing perhaps to improve would be to integrate the logo more with the 3d design… maybe make a 3d logo as well? Right now it feels a little like an after thought to your particles… (Is it possible to get a reflection map of the particles onto the logo?) might help sales as well…
hope your next one gets accepted
sometimes reviewers can be really ******
it’s even more frustrating when you do not get feedback for items which got rejected
3d render intergration (removed black matte coloring)
add 14 logo animations
new preview
additional global controls
HARD. This is ridiculous.
The flat logos and text are not composited or integrated well with the 3d environment. The logos look ‘pasted’ on which detracts from the beauty of the depth of field, shadows and atmosphere of the 3d particle animation and gives the overall video a less professional look
<<
Now i get eplanation. Thats good, but ... ive already linked to accepted files with such logo integration.