edit post removed. ---------------------------------------
This project is identical to 2 other projects youâre currently selling, only with a different logo. Again, while we do have a policy that allows 3-variations on a single theme, 2 projects cannot be nearly identical to one another.
The fact that you have 2 already for sale is technically violating the rule, but since it was approved, weâve given you an exception in this case.
A great looking project but as @MotionRevolver said, another repetition âŚ
Just make something has new technology and complex excuation to get approved this is my experiance,
Good luck with other work and keep trying, the quality team here are very cooperative and very objective
Keywords arenât factored into determining whether or not projects are similar.
Project variation is based on visual aspects only. From a design, execution, and concept standpoint, these projects are identical.
As you can imagine, you could take this exact animation, and change the logo/symbol to create an endless amount of identical projects, which is why the 3-variation rule exists.
Johnny, Iâm sorry but I think there may be some confusion as to what we mean by the term âconceptâ. A concept, when it comes to video templates, is the projectâs overall design, appearance, and execution of animation. When we mention that the concept is the same between 2 or more projects, we arenât referring to the subject matter or an object used inside of the animation.
From a standpoint of visual appearance and execution of animation, these projects are identical. All 3 show white lines emanating from 3D objects on a blue background, with basic white text accompanying the 3D object.
Furthermore, in all 3 projects, the 3D object is situated along the right 1/3 of the frame, with text on either side of the object. To be honest, the only different I can find between these projects is the 3D object itself. Everything else is identical.
For a visual reference, please compare screenshots of your 3 projects below:
Had these projects varied in some way, we may have been able to accept all 3. Perhaps altering the method in which the object builds onto the screen, or coming up with different movements, camera angles, or even using a different color for the background or lines.
But from the review teamâs standpoint, youâve taken the same Ae project, and duplicated it 3 times, only swapping out the 3D object to fit into a different genre or niche. Quite frankly, when viewing those 3 screenshots together, they look like theyâre from the same project file.
So, the answer to your question above is yes. (Perhaps you missed it, but I actually mentioned this in the rejection email)
On the other hand, using your own portfolio to illustrate what IS considered an acceptable useage of the 3-variation rule, please reference the following 3 projects:
While the above projects use the same animation technique, and share visual similarities, they are not visually identical.
Hopefully this helps to understand a little more clearly. But as always, please let me know if theres still smoethign youâre not fully clear about.
1 Like
Sell it to the client directly or add the additional animation to one of your existing items to make a pack. Problem solved.
1 Like
Iâm not a staff member.
Has nothing to do with whatâs fair or not. Youâve explained the situation⌠Iâve provided you with two solutions based on the facts.
You missed my point. I provided two possible solutions to your problem. Those solutions are neither fair or unfair⌠they are just solutions. Whether it is fair that your items have not been approved is a different matter entirely⌠one that I have not even commented on either way.
And just for the record, I have never âtag-teamedâ with a reviewer, whatever that means.