This item was rejected today… Help please
@n2n44 Do you have an idea please ?
hi, as for me , I like it, though, to be perfectly honest with u, I think that the real deal about this item is that the text is really not looking clear and thus has a big negative impact on readability overall and thus on the efficiency of the design. After all why having a text if this is not really readable , that the text is not given the right exposure and so on? I also tend to believe that this is quite harmonious and tasteful what u have here, no doubt, but on the other hand, u also turn out to have very little contrast and - thought u are not violating this basic design principle all the same I want to mention it so that u do not get me wrong - that there are consequences win hierarchy. In deed, very little facts are springing out more and I cannot really see several levels of hierarchy in the texts, not even really two, actually, that is to say the bare minimum : primary and secondary ones … but once again this is a cool base that u have here and I think that with a little additional work and extra value or emphasizing, u can easily reach the next level and I assume get the item accepted, too, at least , I think so …
Thank you for the valuable input… I really appreciate your time and effort… I think for text visibility, Yes, as an app there can be an accessible problem of course… and I’m not sure about that transparent glassmorphic cover whether it’s implementable or nor practically. But I still didn’t get the hierarchy problem… I has a consistent Main and Paragraph text sizes defined (Although as you said they are too small) … I don’t think I can re-ipload this with those font changes as they may not consider it as a considerable change. Thank you again and hope to hear from you…
hierarchy issue is about having some things being outstanding and really being seen at first sight while u clearly define “secondary information” that is just for people who want to get into details
Yes I guess it’s again the contrast of the text matters… any how in this way there is an accessibility issue in this as an app design… but I don’t think I’m permitted to re-upload with those text changes only… what do you think ?
well this is the thing that is usually said “to resubmit, u need to bring significant changes” which is hard to interpret bcose hard to gauge what “significant” is lol